Pioneering Biofabrication: The Fusion of Hydrogels and Fibers by Bayreuth Researchers
The Innovation at Bayreuth
The University of Bayreuth’s latest contribution to the field of biofabrication is a unique device that integrates hydrogel technology with fiber spinning, a method known as touch-spinning. This blend of technologies facilitates the creation of tissue-like structures with fibrous textures and uniaxial cell alignment, a feat that was previously unachievable in a single device. The device, which has been both invented and patented in Bayreuth, promises to significantly enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of living tissue production.
The Role of Hydrogels and Fibers
Hydrogels have long been recognized for their utility in tissue engineering, serving as scaffolding materials that support the growth and development of biological tissues. The Bayreuth team’s experiments have involved various hydrogels, assessing their properties to optimize the biofabrication process. By integrating these hydrogels with a fiber system, the researchers have managed to reduce the complexity of processing hydrogels, such as the need for cross-linking to bolster their mechanical properties. This synergy not only improves the material’s mechanical characteristics but also facilitates subsequent tissue formation.
Biofabrication with Bioprinting
Bioprinting stands out as a pivotal technique in biofabrication, offering the ability to tailor the material, physical, chemical, and biological properties of the so-called cell ink used in biomedical applications. The University of Bayreuth’s approach involves a two-step crosslinking method for preparing 3D-bioprinted hydrogel scaffolds. This process includes the physical crosslinking of alginate components with CaCl2, followed by the chemical crosslinking of GelMA components under ultraviolet light. Such advancements in bioink technology are critical for the accurate and gentle deposition of cell units, minimizing process-induced cell damage.
The strides made by Dr. Ionov and his team in combining hydrogels and fibers through 3D bioprinting technology represent a significant leap forward in the field of biofabrication. This novel approach not only simplifies the production of tissue constructs but also enhances their quality and functionality, bringing us closer to the goal of artificially producing biological tissues and organs. As this technology continues to evolve, it holds the potential to revolutionize medical treatments and organ transplantation, offering new hope to patients worldwide.
In conclusion, the University of Bayreuth’s pioneering work in biofabrication underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in advancing medical technology. By bridging the gap between hydrogels and fibers, the team has set a new benchmark in the production of lifelike tissues, opening up new avenues for research and application in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Sun W; Schaffer S; Dai K; Yao L; Feinberg A; Webster-Wood V 3D Printing Hydrogel-Based Soft and Biohybrid Actuators: A Mini-Review on Fabrication Techniques, Applications, and Challenges. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2021, 8, 1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Raviv D; Zhao W; McKnelly C; Papadopoulou A; Kadambi A; Shi B; Hirsch S; Dikovsky D; Zyracki M; Olguin C; Raskar R; Tibbits S Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations. Sci. Rep 2014, 4, 1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Xiong Z; Zheng ML; Dong XZ; Chen WQ; Jin F; Zhao ZS; Duan XM Asymmetric microstructure of hydrogel: Two-photon microfabrication and stimuli-responsive behavior. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 10353–10359. [Google Scholar]
Xing JF; Zheng ML; Duan XM Two-photon polymerization microfabrication of hydrogels: an advanced 3D printing technology for tissue engineering and drug delivery. Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44, 5031–5039. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ovsianikov A; Gruene M; Pflaum M; Koch L; Maiorana F; Wilhelmi M; Haverich A; Chichkov B Laser printing of cells into 3D scaffolds. Biofabrication 2010, 2, 014104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]